Showing posts with label may the best party win. Show all posts
Showing posts with label may the best party win. Show all posts

30.7.11

Fluffy Bunnies.

It began with talking about the Group of Seven.

It ended with me watching two British soldiers wrestling on a balcony while one tried to eat marshmallows out of the other's ear.

Perhaps that doesn't tell the whole story. Bear with me, and I shall elaborate.

It was a housewarming party for a newly married couple -- always a happy occasion, n'est-ce pas? I arrived to find the apartment filled with revelry of all ages, and from all walks of life. In that crowd of thirty, I knew about four other people. Clearly, that was my cue to start mingling. And snacking. There were these nifty little watermelon hors d'oeuvres... but anyway, mostly mingling.

During the chatter, I ended up discussing books I'd read recently, and I mentioned how peculiar I found it to hear Steve Martin reference the Group of Seven in his latest book. I suppose I should be grateful for the blank look I received, because it at least proved that I'd managed to hold their attention up until this point.

"Are you familiar with the Group of Seven?", I asked.

"No, I'm sorry. I suppose I really should know more about Canadian politics, shouldn't I?"

And now it was my turn to be sorry, because I couldn't stop myself. I launched into a discussion of who they were, and the landscapes they painted, and why their landscapes were actually such a revolutionary idea at the time, and how they shaped Canada's self-image... fortunately, at some point I was interrupted and the young lady I was talking to escaped. It was then that I realised, "Denton, you fool! She's the hostess' best friend, people are here waiting for the chance to talk with her, and you're busy talking to her about oil paintings from 1920. Was that really the ideal topic of conversation?" Shamefully, I retreated to the artichoke dip, and wondered if my internal anecodotomer was only mis-calibrated, or if it was completely non-functional. A serious matter indeed, to ponder over artichokes.

Fortunately, my next chance to start a conversation with her went along a slightly different path. This was a bit later in the evening, the children had gone home, and the remaining guests had traded the veggie platter for the beer cooler hours ago. It was the sort of situation in which someone (specifically, that same girl from earlier) would invariably declare, at thirty minutes to midnight, that what they wanted was a cocktail with marshmallows in it. Were there any marshmallows in the kitchen? Does anyone live near enough that they could get marshmallows from their kitchen? Are any grocery stores open right now?

At this point I spoke up. "I've got some marshmallows in the trunk of my car, if you want them."

It's a good thing the conversation stopped entirely when people heard that -- it gave me a chance to explain that these were no longer ordinary marshmallows. You see, I'd gone camping with friends three weeks ago, and when we packed up the supplies, there was still one barely-used bag of marshmallows left over. I was told I could have the marshmallows, but only if I put them to good use. "Of course I will", I promised. And then I left them in my car for three weeks.

As the partygoers would soon learn, three weeks does odd things to a bag of marshmallows, if those happen to be the hottest three weeks of the year. On the side of the bag where a small hole had been opened, air had gotten in and mummified the marshmallows. They had become the marshmallows you find in breakfast cereals: as solid as wood, but able to break down with a stubborn squeaking sound if you bite them hard enough. Amongst the crowd, they quickly became popular toys to throw at people. As for the other half of the bag, though, air had not managed to get it, and all the remaining marshmallows had melted, and congealed into a giant, sticky, pillow-sized marshmallow upon re-cooling. Clearly, making a cocktail from this agglutination was a worthy challenge, so she set to work.

Alas, long after the squeaky mummified marshmallows had disappeared, she returned from the kitchen, defeated. It had proven impossible to separate the melted marshmallow from the plastic bag, and all that she managed to produce was a plastic sheet covered by a shimmering, sticky, sugary mass. But in the spirit of improvisation, another guest (one of the aforementioned British soldiers) who had been overseeing the cocktail attempt concluded that it was close enough to a cream pie to warrant an attempt at the classic routine, and he then found his mate out on the balcony...

At this point, congratulations. You're now caught up on the story! I know, you might be wondering exactly why they decided to start eating the marshmallow out of each other's ears, but anything else I say would only be conjecture at this point. Perhaps... yes, perhaps it's best if we leave the final chapters of that evening vested in some semblance of mystery (or possibly, dignity).

Besides, at that point I was raiding the snack table for all the remaining cupcakes. It was a wonderful evening, indeed.

23.3.11

Election.

Well, here we go -- another federal election. I'm predicting another Conservative minority government, which probably won't surprise many people. What is surprising, though, is that it's happening at all. There's a distinct lack of scandal, outrage, protest and disdain in Canada right now... there are challenges that we have to deal with, but all things considered, we're doing pretty well at the moment. My hope, then, is that this is going to translate into a relatively clean campaign.

With that in mind, I'd like to lay down a few points of etiquette.

Rule #1: Political parties are not evil.

If I may be honest with my socialist soul, the Conservative Party isn't going to plunge the nation into a police state ruled by American corporations. That also goes the other way: I suspect that even if the Green Party were in charge, the oil fields wouldn't get driven to bankruptcy by new regulations - not only because the oil companies would still find a way to make things profitable, but also because any such changes to regulation and enforcement would be tied up for years.

It doesn't matter who your MP is, they'll still send your parents a letter congratulating them on their 50th anniversary, they'll still cut the ribbon at a new hospital wing, they'll still wear your local team's jersey. They're all trying to do their best for Canadians, so enough with the name-calling, already. I admit, there are a few under every tent that'll veer towards corruption, hiring close personal friends as "consultants" and whatnot... but that brings up the second point.

Rule #2: There are more people in the party than just its leader.

Yes, I'm predicting a Conservative minority. But will it be the same minority? Likely not. Every riding has its own feelings about their MPs, and even if Stephen Harper is safe with his seat, that doesn't mean his favourite key players will all be available to serve in the cabinet. Will some provinces change their allegiances? Will certain individuals leave their mark, either by their presence or their absence? For an "unnecessary" election, there's still the potential for a lot of change. And speaking of which...

Rule #3: The election is not unnecessary.

Did it have to be *right* now, in early 2011? No. But complaining about this election being unnecessary is wrong for more than just the previous reason -- there's also the plain and simple fact that this is how our government works. Yes, it'll cost $300 million. If they held it in nine months, you know how much it would cost? $300 million. And if they didn't hold one for another three years, do you think they'd just tell everyone at Elections Canada to take some time off?

Don't get too uptight over the "cost to Canadian taxpayers" for this one. I'm relatively certain they made room for this in the budget. Really, there's only one way it would be a waste of $300 million...

Rule #4: VOTE.

The last federal election had the lowest voter turnout in Canadian history. 41% of the people didn't vote at all. Did the government interpret that as a "none of the above" vote, and change their plans to accommodate this silent majority? Or were those non-voters ignored in return?

Not voting is the easiest way to turn political cynicism into a self-fulfilling prophecy. And like I said before, this is going to be a campaign without scandal or outrage. It's entirely possible that as low as the turnout was last time, this year might be lower still. And that scares me.

Right now, Canadian fighter planes are dropping bombs on Libya, in an effort to help bring democracy to a people who found the courage to leave their houses and be heard.

What right do we have to force democracy on others, when we don't even care about it ourselves?